Did Justice Roberts intentionally preempt the Oath of Office so that the POTUS would be effectively rendered null? Did a legal coup just occur right before our eyes? Is this the beginning of the predicted civil unrest?
Why would a sitting SCOTUS judge do that?
The United States of America happens to be a Constitutional Republic, and the Inaugural Oath is intended for the defense of her Constitution. Yet Roberts, an agent of justice, administered said Oath while he verily was aware of multiple cases for conference on High Court dockets across the land challenging the eligibility of Mr. Obama. The mounting legal contention before the High Courts is the transparency of the new President’s status, his constitutional eligibility and allegiance to uphold the very document.
Is Justice Roberts an American hero, one who threw himself, in an act of defiance, in front of the framework of US Constitution, as would Secret Service agents in defense of the President? It certainly seems epic in gesture that Roberts would sacrifice himself in this manner, perhaps a telltale sign of a coming dark and heroic chapter in the American saga…
In any case, Obama retook the Oath this morning, without the Lincoln Bible.
After an inaugural price tag of $150 million dollars, and the most draconian security apparatus suffocating a lackluster crowd of mere 800 thousand, we the people still failed to be granted a legitimate Oath on January 20th?
It can’t get more dramatic than this folks!
-IAT
Note: A leader, trained as a Constitutional lawyer, who in the thick of battle capitulates and thus abdicates his Oath to the Constitution under a subversive maneuver from an adept opponent is perhaps not a leader after all, at least not one worthy to wield the helm of our nation’s destiny.
