Emasculation
Disney’s Earth, out in the theaters on Earth Day, has some interesting scenes to be sure, but frankly, the cinematography leaves quite a bit to be desired, especially when there have been so many riveting and spectacular nature films and photographs in the past several decades.
So one wonders, what do the Disney folks have in mind? Other than pure marketing and merchandising of old footage, that is…
And it struck me, well more than that! it strangled me:
Take a look at this poster: the three images are of mothers and their cub/calves, going on their journeys… a very mammalian and comforting image, until one actually watches the film and discovers that there are only three instances where adult male animals are featured.
In each instance, the male is either ridiculed as frivolous, or selfish, or incompetent, or killed off as ultimately irrelevant. Note the fine print in the poster referring to “families” yet the graphic visuals depict three mothers and their respective children!
Where are the Fathers?
The most alarming example in the film is the emasculation of Sunlight by referring to it through feminine adjectives. Sunlight in its mythological and “biological” context is a masculine energy. Whereas the Earth is the feminine, Sun, or Apollo is the masculine balance of this dance.
Thus, according to Disney, the prosperity of the progeny of Earth, or Gaia, is feminized, and the masculine element is marginalized and fatally wounded.
This concept becomes further alarming as we note that Disney, along with Clear Channel properties and other mass media conglomerates, have increasingly been mouthing a policy whereby single parenthood is championed and seductively disseminated through their entertainment/containment complexes.
Eventually this line of logic can be followed to Planned Parenthood and their massive global campaign to promote abortion under the auspices of “woman’s choice”. Furthermore, we are increasingly granted the displeasure of hearing eloquent and brilliant propaganda and policy positioning thought characters such as Hillary and Barack.
To be clear, this is a vast and sinister global enterprise — oops, did I set off the tinfoil radars again? — that endeavors to emasculate the male energy in order to achieve a spiritual depravity and political sedation that borders on overt eugenics. There are other parallel paths, but more about them later, eh? However, if you’re still interested, do your research on this puppy: Codex Alimentarius.
Cheers,
-IAT
